Models

For a long time, people thought our solar system revolved around the Earth. Copernicus (or Galileo to some) came around and proved the planets revolved around our Sun.

Models are important - they are the perspective of an individual's perception of any given event. Models are always biased, but the objective should be to choose a model with the least bias possible.

How is this achieved?

Scrutinize opposing aspects, think critically, and have an open mind.

"All Truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

- Arthur Schopenhauer

Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't.

- Mark Twain


These opinions below may be my own or may belong to the authors whom I reference. They are posted for the benefit of mankind, so that we may collectively achieve a common ground and transition into a new golden era as seamlessly as possible.


Thursday, January 31, 2013

Disclosure Now: NEW 3-HR Russian Documentary Blasts Financial Tyranny!


We need to spread the word.  Tell your friends it's time to wake up.  Please go to David Wilcock's site to see the full article with photos and legal briefings.

by David Wilcock

January 30, 2013, 4:44 pm


On January 30, 2013, top Russian network REN-TV aired "Shadow Gold"--ANOTHER three-hour documentary blasting Financial Tyranny. See it here NOW, before it is officially translated!

India is also picking up the Financial Tyranny investigation as well. The alliance is finally revealing itself -- and demanding justice.

[MAJOR UPDATE, Same Night -- "India Has Every Right to be Pissed Off."]
  

THE GREATEST SECRET OF MODERN HISTORY

The graphic you just saw at the top of this article is what all the official, on-the-books gold in the world looks like -- if you formed it into a single cube.

This was produced by Oto Godfrey as part of his ongoing efforts to illustrate Financial Tyranny with visual metaphors.

Once you see it as a cube, whose edges fit comfortably into an Olympic-sized swimming pool, it's easy to have a new perspective.


FOURTEEN AND A HALF CUBES

Is this really all the gold that has ever been pulled out of the Earth -- worldwide -- in all of recorded human history?

Apparently not. The real amount is about 14 and a half of these cubes.

The total volume -- now being hidden away by the international version of the Federal Reserve, called the BIS -- is 2,420,937.4 metric tons.

That's two million, 420 thousand, 937.4 tons of gold.

This is, quite literally, considered the greatest secret of modern history.

Not anymore. [Scroll down to the bottom for the embedded video.]


WORLD WARS I AND II HAD A HIDDEN PURPOSE

World Wars I and II were fake.

Both sides were secretly being run by the same people -- with the same goal.

Over 100 million people died -- for a completely different reason than they thought.

Both sides fighting these wars -- Axis and Allies -- were owned and controlled by the same international bankers.

That is the great, ugly truth we must face if we want to heal this planet.

These world wars were used to plunder central banks and private holdings of their gold -- worldwide -- and turn them over to the Federal Reserve.

The mass seizures of gold occurred before, during and after World War I as well.


NOW IS NOT THE TIME FOR USING LAUGHTER AS A COPING MECHANISM

Look... I know how horrible this is. It's almost beyond imagination.

About one percent of our audience -- some of whom may be paid to do this -- attack us with astonishing passion, fury and violence online.

Laughter and sarcasm is not going to help us get through this.

Some may decide to do this in order to avoid facing a very uncomfortable truth.

Others hyper-scrutinize the data, desperately seeking to find one incorrect point -- hoping to then discredit the entire investigation.

In so doing, they feel like they have vanquished the demon of Truth -- and can continue to stay in the "real world" a little longer.

Nonetheless, once this truth is exposed and healed, on a worldwide level, the resulting benefits will be absolutely spectacular.

Now there are six hours of prime-time documentaries -- on one of the top Russian television networks -- directly supporting our investigation.

REN-TV admitted to me that Financial Tyranny was "utterly groundbreaking" -- and was the main text they used to fuel both documentaries.


THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION, CREATING THE USSR IN 1917, WAS A FEDERAL RESERVE PROJECT

Here is a link to a Yale University Press article on the Bolshevik gold seizures -- the top item in a current Google search for "bolshevik gold 1917."

The entire Bolshevik Revolution, which formed the Soviet Union from 1917-1922, was not-so-secretly financed by the Federal Reserve bankers.

The political cartoon you see below was drawn by Robert Minor, in the St. Louis Dispatch, in 1911 -- and is featured on page 211 of "The Creature from Jekyll Island."

If you don't believe me, type in "bolshevik revolution federal reserve" into any Internet search engine -- and start reading.
  

EXECUTIVE ORDER 6102

On April 5, 1933, Executive Order 6102 was used to make it illegal to own gold in the United States.

Violations for "gold hoarding" were punishable by up to a 10,000-dollar fine, ten years in prison, or both.

This letter was ordered to be "posted in a conspicuous place" by the US Postmaster General -- during the worst part of the Great Depression.

Everyone had less than a month to comply.

Their gold was purchased at 20 dollars an ounce -- and then quickly revalued up to 35 dollars an ounce after it was over.
  

Please go here to view the whole article!  Disclosure is here.

Monday, January 21, 2013

OPPT: Individual UCC Filing Templates with Tutorial



Please go to the link below to access the full filing templates.


Here's a list of individual UCC filing templates as compiled by Paula Humfrey and Desmond Grundy.  Desmond has also created a nice concise summary of how to use these documents.  I know a lot of you have been asking how to use these documents, and frankly I didn't know what to tell you other than get the questions to people who can answer them. I am not a lawyer. But there are a number of very bright people coming to the fore who are knowledgeable in this area of UCC law.

Below is a very good synopsis of what the OPPT has done...

Another reader wrote: On Jan 18, 2013, at 11:09 PM

"Regarding the OPPT:

I'm a freedom loving pillared reiki master, light worker, and PhD scientist.  I'm clued into the language of Be'ing and DO'ing to some extent, and competent enough to understand the legalese, but not the reasons why each phrase is so important to the process.  Even still, I've been pretty baffled by a lot of the approach that OPPT is taking to undo the Cabal and PTW.  It didn't make sense until I looked into "Registered in COMMERCE" that they keep using everywhere.

What I have ultimately walked away with is that the US Constitution allows government the ability to regulate Commerce.  So the PTW hid all their schemes in Commerce.  When OPPT registered everything in Commerce they basically declared that [government and by proxy banks, and corporations don't have the right to regulate, own, or trade people and many other things registered in commerce (like DNA)].  So, OPPT doing everything in Commerce is undoing the PTW work around they found to circumvent the Constitution.  

How did the cabal do it?  The cabal and PTW basically built the strawman to register everything and everyone in commerce.  Why?  Because the constitution granted government the right to regulate commerce and explicitly forbid them from bossing around a natural person among other restrictions.  So, they tricked natural people into registering themselves in Commerce, and then used the freedom built into the Constitution to regulate, own, and trade everything they had just put into commerce.  This includes you and me.  Once you're registered in commerce via birth certificates, licences, social security or simple contracts then they had you.

OPPT basically says "Wait, I'm actually a natural person and so is every person that you're claiming as a thing registered in Commerce.  Ergo you don't have the right to regulate, sell, manipulate, kill, molest, or eff with it in any way shape or form as these 'things' are actually natural persons.  Oh and by the way we have the authority to stop you using non-lethal force."  OPPT seems to go beyond this too in really destroying all the corporate entities meant to handle all the commerce they created.  This may not be 100% precise regarding what's going on, but it's a good first attempt at trying to explain in layman's terms what the hell is going on."

- Aggroed Lighthacker

Trustee Heather Tucci-Jarraf responds:
The Constitution was NOT for the people, however, they had to put one little provision in their to preserve the perpetuity of the people...That was the ONE OF THE REASONS for all the deceit...the people would never consent if they knew... however, this analysis is pretty good start... considering only one layer... it does not consider the multi-dimensional aspects that are involved.

Trustee Caleb Skinner responds:
That's really a good understanding, nice work


Tuesday, January 15, 2013

It Begins: Bundesbank To Commence Repatriating Gold From New York Fed



This is huge!   Full links at the original ZeroHedge article.

In what could be a watershed moment for the price, provenance, and future of physical gold, not to mention the "stability" of the entire monetary regime based on rock solid, undisputed "faith and credit" in paper money, German Handelsblatt reports in an exclusive that the long suffering German gold, all official 3,396 tons of it, is about to be moved. Specifically, it is about to be partially moved out of the New York Fed, where the majority, or 45% of it is currently stored, as well as the entirety of the 11% of German gold held with the Banque de France, and repatriated back home to Buba in Frankfurt, where just 31% of it is held as of this moment. And while it is one thing for a "crazy, lunatic" dictator such as Hugo Chavez to pull his gold out of the Bank of England, it is something entirely different, and far less dismissible, when the bank with the second most official gold reserves in the world proceeds to formally pull some of its gold from the bank with the most. In brief: this is a momentous development, one which may signify that the regime of mutual assured and very much telegraphed - because if the central banks don't have faith in one another, why should anyone else? - trust in central banks by other central banks is ending.

Much more importantly, it is being telegraphed as such, with Buba fully aware of just what the consequences of this (first partial, and then full; and certainly full vis-a-vis the nouveau socialist regime of Francois Hollande which will soon hold zero German gold) repatriation will be in a global monetary arena, which is already scraping by on the last traces of faith in a monetary system that is slowly but surely dying but first diluting itself to oblivion. And in simple game theory terms, the first party to defect from the prisoner's dilemma of all the bulk of global gold being held by the Fed, defects best. Then the second. Then the third. Until, in this particular case, the last central bank to pull its gold from the NY Fed and the other 2 primary depositories of developed world gold, London and Paris, just happens to discover their gold was never there to begin with, and instead served as collateral to paper gold subsequently rehypothecated several hundred times, and whose ultimate ownership deed is long gone.

It would be very ironic, if the Bundesbank, which many had assumed had bent over backwards to accommodate Mario Draghi's Goldmanesque demands to allow implicit monetization of peripheral nations' debts has just "returned the favor" by launching the greatest physical gold scramble of all time.

From Handelsblatt:

Die Bundesbank hat ein neues Konzept ausgearbeitet, wo sie künftig ihre Goldreserven lagern will. Nach Informationen des Handelsblatts (Dienstausgabe) sieht dieses Konzept, das am kommenden Mittwoch bekanntgegeben werden soll, vor, den heimischen Standort aufzuwerten, in New York dafür weniger Gold zu lagern und überhaupt kein Gold mehr in Paris zu horten.

Derzeit lagert das Gold der Bundesbank ihren Angaben zufolge in New York, London, Paris und Frankfurt. In der amerikanischen Notenbank Fed lagern 45 Prozent der insgesamt 3.396 Tonnen Gold, in der Bank of England in London 13 Prozent, in der Banque de France in Paris elf Prozent und im Hauptsitz in Frankfurt 31 Prozent. Diese Verteilung soll sich nun ändern.

We present it in the original for fear of losing something in translation, but in broad English terms the above reads as follows:

The German Bundesbank is developing a new approach as to where its gold will be stored. According to exclusive information, to be fully announced on Wednesday, the bank will in the future hold less gold in the New York Fed, and no more hold in Paris (Banque de France). As a result, the distribution of German gold, of which 45% is held in New York, 13% in London, 11% in Paris and 31% in Frankfurt, is about to change.

There is no need to explain why this is huge news (for those who have not followed our series on the concerns and issue plaguing German gold can catch up here, here, here, here, and certainly here) . At least no need for us to explain. Instead we will let the Bundesbank do the explanation. The following section is the answer provided by the Bundesbank itself in late October in response to the question why it does not move the gold back to Germany:

The reasons for storing gold reserves with foreign partner central banks are historical since, at the time, gold at these trading centres was transferred to the Bundesbank. To be more specific: in October 1951 the Bank deutscher Länder, the Bundesbank’s predecessor, purchased its first gold for DM 2.5 million; that was 529 kilograms at the time. By 1956, the gold reserves had risen to DM 6.2 billion, or 1,328 tonnes; upon its foundation in 1957, the Bundesbank took over these reserves. No further gold was added until the 1970s. During that entire period, we had nothing but the best of experiences with our partners in New York, London and Paris. There was never any doubt about the security of Germany’s gold. In future, we wish to continue to keep gold at international gold trading centres so that, when push comes to shove, we can have it available as a reserve asset as soon as possible. Gold stored in your home safe is not immediately available as collateral in case you need foreign currency. Take, for instance, the key role that the US dollar plays as a reserve currency in the global financial system. The gold held with the New York Fed can, in a crisis, be pledged with the Federal Reserve Bank as collateral against US dollar-denominated liquidity. Similar pound sterling liquidity could be obtained by pledging the gold that is held with the Bank of England.
And in case the above was not clear enough, below is the speech Buba's Andreas Dobret delivered to none other than NY Fed's Bill Dudley in early November:

Please let me also comment on the bizarre public discussion we are currently facing in Germany on the safety of our gold deposits outside Germany – a discussion which is driven by irrational fears.

In this context, I wish to warn against voluntarily adding fuel to the general sense of uncertainty among the German public in times like these by conducting a “phantom debate” on the safety of our gold reserves.

The arguments raised are not really convincing. And I am glad that this is common sense for most Germans. Following the statement by the President of the Federal Court of Auditors in Germany, the discussion is now likely to come to an end – and it should do so before it causes harm to the excellent relationship between the Bundesbank and the US Fed.

Throughout these sixty years, we have never encountered the slightest problem, let alone had any doubts concerning the credibility of the Fed [ZH may, and likely will, soon provide a few historical facts which will cast some serious doubts on this claim. Very serious doubts]. And for this, Bill, I would like to thank you personally. I am also grateful for your uncomplicated cooperation in so many matters. The Bundesbank will remain the Fed’s trusted partner in future, and we will continue to take advantage of the Fed’s services by storing some of our currency reserves as gold in New York.

Incidentally, what Zero Hedge did provide after this article, was factual evidence that the Buba's very much "trusted partner" had been skimming it on physical gold deliveries on at least one occasion, in "Exclusive: Bank Of England To The Fed: "No Indication Should, Of Course, Be Given To The Bundesbank..."

So we wonder: what changed in the three months between November and now (Could this be referring to "THE DISCLOSURE" post on the One People's Public Trust? Here, a judge weights in on OPPT), that has caused such a dramatic about face at the Bundesbank, and that in light of all of the above, will make is explicitly very unambigous that the act of gold repatriation, assuming of course that Handelsblatt did not mischaracterize what is happening and misreport the facts, means the "excellent relationship" between the Fed and Buba, not to mention Banque de France which will shortly hold precisely zero German gold, has just collapsed.

Also, if the Bundesbank is first, who is next?

Finally, once the scramble to satisfy physical gold deliverable claims manifests itself in the market, we can't help but wonder what will happen to the price of gold: both paper and physical?

Cosmology Journal: Polonnaruwa meteorite contains fossilized ALIEN LIFE



From the paper, "Since this meteorite is considered to be an extinct cometary fragment, the idea of microbial life carried within comets and the theory of cometary panspermia is thus vindicated." This should be going viral.  



January 14, 2013 - Why isn’t this breaking CNN, NBC, ABC, BFF news, is a whole other question. Coverup? Probably. We have to hear about the greatest discovery since bacon, from a Sri Lankan news blog.

A meteorite that Landed recently, close to the ancient city of Polonnaruwa in Sri Lanka has been described as the most important scientific discovery in the last 500 years as it carried “compelling evidence of life” from outer space.

The scientists who discovered the contents of the meteorite said, “we report here the first compelling evidence for life existing outside the earth."



Following extensive lab work in the United Kingdom and Sri Lanka four scientists in a paper said , “We report the discovery for the first time of fossilized diatoms in a carbonaceous meteorite that fell on 29 December 2012”. Diatoms are a variety of algae.

They very firmly said contamination, a hazard scientists face when examining things fallen from the sky on the ground is excluded in the meteorite they have named Polonnaruwa.

The four scientists, Chandra Wickramasinghe, J. Wallis, D.H.Wallis, and Anil Samaranayaka said, there are also structures in the meteorite similar to the red rain cells that fell within days in the area.

The team in a paper to be published in the Journal of Cosmology added, “The new data on fossil diatom provide strong evidence to support the theory of Cometary Panspermia” -a theory that says life came to our planet earth and other worlds hitchhiking on comets from far corners of the universe.

Here is the Journal of Cosmology PDF with the full research findings:


Queen's Secret VETO Power on UK Laws



The Queen was asked for consent on a range of bills,
including those affecting her estates. There is growing
 concern in parliament at a lack of transparency over
 the royals’ role in lawmaking. Photograph: Sergeant Dan Harmer

Reposted from American Kabuki

Secret papers show extent of senior royals' veto over bills
Court order reveals how approval of Queen and Prince Charles is sought on range of bills

Robert Booth
The Guardian, Monday 14 January 2013

The extent of the Queen and Prince Charles's secretive power of veto over new laws has been exposed after Downing Street lost its battle to keep information about its application secret.

Whitehall papers prepared by Cabinet Office lawyers show that overall at least 39 bills have been subject to the most senior royals' little-known power to consent to or block new laws. They also reveal the power has been used to torpedo proposed legislation relating to decisions about the country going to war.

The internal Whitehall pamphlet was only released following a court order and shows ministers and civil servants are obliged to consult the Queen and Prince Charles in greater detail and over more areas of legislation than was previously understood.

The new laws that were required to receive the seal of approval from the Queen or Prince Charles cover issues from higher education and paternity pay to identity cards and child maintenance.

In one instance the Queen completely vetoed the Military Actions Against Iraq Bill in 1999, a private member's bill that sought to transfer the power to authorise military strikes against Iraq from the monarch to parliament.



She was even asked to consent to the Civil Partnership Act 2004 because it contained a declaration about the validity of a civil partnership that would bind her.

In the pamphlet, the Parliamentary Counsel warns civil servants that if consent is not forthcoming there is a risk "a major plank of the bill must be removed".

"This is opening the eyes of those who believe the Queen only has a ceremonial role," said Andrew George, Liberal Democrat MP for St Ives, which includes land owned by the Duchy of Cornwall, the Prince of Wales' hereditary estate.

"It shows the royals are playing an active role in the democratic process and we need greater transparency in parliament so we can be fully appraised of whether these powers of influence and veto are really appropriate. At any stage this issue could come up and surprise us and we could find parliament is less powerful than we thought it was."

Charles has been asked to consent to 20 pieces of legislation and this power of veto has been described by constitutional lawyers as a royal "nuclear deterrent" that may help explain why ministers appear to pay close attention to the views of senior royals.

The guidance also warns civil servants that obtaining consent can cause delays to legislation and reveals that even amendments may need to be run past the royals for further consent.

"There has been an implication that these prerogative powers are quaint and sweet but actually there is real influence and real power, albeit unaccountable," said John Kirkhope, the legal scholar who fought the freedom of information case to access the papers.

The release of the papers comes amid growing concern in parliament at a lack of transparency over the royals' role in lawmaking. George has set down a series of questions to ministers asking for a full list of bills that have been consented to by the Queen and Prince Charles and have been vetoed or amended.

The guidance states that the Queen's consent is likely to be needed for laws affecting hereditary revenues, personal property or personal interests of the Crown, the Duchy of Lancaster or the Duchy of Cornwall.

Consent is also needed if it affects the Duchy of Cornwall. These guidelines effectively mean the Queen and Charles both have power over laws affecting their sources of private income.

The Queen uses revenues from the Duchy of Lancaster's 19,000 hectares of land and 10 castles to pay for the upkeep of her private homes at Sandringham and Balmoral, while the prince earns £18m-a-year from the Duchy of Cornwall.

A Buckingham Palace spokeswoman said: "It is a long established convention that the Queen is asked by parliament to provide consent to those bills which parliament has decided would affect crown interests. The sovereign has not refused to consent to any bill affecting crown interests unless advised to do so by ministers."

A spokesman for Prince Charles said: "In modern times, the prince of Wales has never refused to consent to any bill affecting Duchy of Cornwall interests, unless advised to do so by ministers. Every instance of the prince's consent having been sought and given to legislation is a matter of public record."

Graham Smith, director of Republic, the campaign for an elected head of state, has also called for full disclosure of the details of the occasions when royal consent has been refused.

"The suggestion in these documents that the Queen withheld consent for a private member's bill on such an important issue as going to war beggars belief," he said. "We need to know whether laws have been changed as the result of a private threat to withhold that consent."

The Cabinet Office fought against the publication of the 30-page internal guidance in a 15-month freedom of information dispute. It refused a request to release the papers from Kirkhope, a notary public who wanted to use them in his graduate studies at Plymouth University.

It was ordered to do so by the Information Commissioner. The Cabinet Office then appealed that decision in the Information Tribunal but lost.

Royal influence

Here is a list of government bills that have required the consent of the Queen or the Prince of Wales. It is not exhaustive and in only one case does it show whether any changes were made. It is drawn from data gleaned from two Freedom of Information requests.

The Queen

Agriculture (miscellaneous provisions) bill 1962

Housing Act 1996

Rating (Valuation Act) 1999

Military actions against Iraq (parliamentary approval bill) 1999 – consent not signified

Pollution prevention and control bill (1999)

High hedges bills 2000/01 and 2002/03

European Union bill 2004

Civil Partnership Act 2004

Higher Education Act 2004

National Insurance Contributions and Statutory Payments Act 2004

Identity cards bill 2004-06

Work and families bill 2005-06

Commons bill 2006

Animal Welfare Act 2006

Charities Act 2006

Child maintenance and other payments bill (2006/07)

Rating (Empty Properties) Act 2007

Courts, Tribunals and Enforcement Act 2007

Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007

Fixed term parliaments bill (2010-12 session)

Prince Charles

Conveyancing and Feudal Reform (Scotland) Act 1970

Land Registration (Scotland Act) 1979

Pilotage bill 1987

Merchant Shipping and Maritime Security Act 1997

House of Lords Act 1999

Gambling bill 2004-05

Road Safety bill 2004-05

Natural environment and rural communities bill 2005-06

London Olympics bill 2005-06

Commons bill 2006

Charities Act 2006

Housing and regeneration bill 2007-08

Energy bill 2007-08

Planning bill 2007-08

Co-operative and community benefit societies and credit unions bill 2008-09

Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction (Lords) 2008-09

Marine and Coastal Access (Lords) 2008-09

Coroners and justice bill 2008-09

Marine navigation aids bill 2009-2010

Wreck Removal Convention Act 2010-12

Monday, January 14, 2013

Sandy Hook Exposed: Too Many Holes

There are simply too many loose-ends surrounding this tragedy.  Don't get me wrong, this is indeed a heinous travesty, and my sincerest condolences go out to everyone involved.  But, as a society, we need to ask better questions and we need to receive reasonable answers.  

How do we explain the mystery of Emily Potter?
How do we explain the actions of the chief medical examiner?
Is the FAU communications professor that has been teaching for 10 years completely insane?  I think he may have a point worth listening to.

Expand your model.


Sunday, January 13, 2013

Judge Dale on the UCC filings, and further info




Judge Dale on the UCC filings, and further info

I asked Judge Dale to please take a moment and review the UCC filings we  have been posting from The People's Trust and to give us his comments on them in simple language for my readers.  This is his response(s)- I added one small note, which is in this colour purple.  -D.

Dear Dee,

This is basically an:  ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS TO ESTABLISH A FOREIGN JUDGMENT visa vie the UCC [UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE] against all corporations and corporate agents claiming to have standing; authority and jurisdiction over a Sovereign American National of the Republic.  The process also establishes damages against those entities for actions taken without establishing proof of implementing regulations and their standing; authority and jurisdiction.

The Administrative Process is the root of the legal deposition process wherein questions are asked of the plaintiff; defendant and witnesses under oath and all proof expected to be presented at trial is challenged.  Concessions are made and acknowledged, so that the only matters actually tried, are the matters or issues that could not be resolved by the deposition process.

It is virtually impossible for any corporate government agent or agency to respond to this UCC process regarding implementing regulations and their lawful standing; authority and jurisdiction.

***  in order to fight against these "foreclosures" first the Governments would have to PROVE that they are NOT Corporations, which they can not do- they cannot go against these filings because to do so would actually PROVE that they ARE Corporations! *** -D.


The Delegates to the Federal Convention specifically voted against granting the Federal Government the power and authority to create corporations, upon the motion of James Madison [See: James Madison Journal of the Federal Convention, Vol.2, page 722]. Therefore, all government corporations, agents and agencies created by our representatives is a usurpation of power and subsequently is unconstitutional.

Only [WE THE PEOPLE] can amend our Constitution.  Whenever our representatives act outside their authority, we need to notify them and then ignore their acts as lawful and continue forward with our Republic!

TERMS:
UCC = Uniform Commercial Code [notice to the world
Wet Ink Signatures = prevents computer documentation
Implementing Regulations = a constitutional published law
Security Financing Statement = establishing you as a responsible individual as opposed to a corporate entity
Nunc Pro Tunc = meaning now for then
PS: The term FOREIGN means that they are foreign to us and we are foreign to them.  A Foreign Judgment is a judgment created without benefit of a Trial.  The Courts have become extremely difficult about accepting these Judgments.

First they require three [3] seals on the Judgment and in many States, the Clerks are directed to present these filings to the President Judge of the County for review before recording them, but his review never comes or the P.Judge denies the filing and instructs the plaintiff to bring a suit before the Court for trial, if they want to secure a judgment!

The UCC Clerks in most States will not record the FINANCING STATEMENT if you do not file it as a Corporate Entity!  But you are not bound to use the State Office where you live!  So far, the State of Washington is still doing everything above board and you can file your documents there.  Once filed, no State Office or Court can refuse to accept a certified copy of a Financing Statement that is already in the system.

People in foreclosure and living in a warranted State can rebuke the process by filing proof that the corporate Bank; agents; agencies involved have defaulted in proving their standing; authority and jurisdiction.

Some States are warrantless, which permits the Bank to by-pass the Court to foreclose. This complicates the process for many. I provided recourse for these individuals in PART 5 of my Expose' but I failed to include specifics.



*****************************************************************

Along with Judge Dale's Comments I am posting  this article by kauilapele which contains links to several helpful documents and links to more filings.


“THE ONE PEOPLE’S PUBLIC TRUST”…TOPPT1776 PRESENTATION
Posted on 2013/01/10by kauilapele


This pdf presentation explains in a bit more “to normal people who don’t necessarily want to read all of the darn legalistic type language” way what TOPPT has done, and why they have done it.
Two places to download this: 1) the Scribd page; 2) from my server here. The file is 7 MB size.

Here’s what is written on the Scribd page:
TOPPT1776 Presentation

“This presentation about The One Peoples Public Trust can be used for educating yourself, sharing with other individuals, or make a professional presentation to large groups. I promise you, you’ll look like a professional! If anyone has questions, direct them to the references and tell them, DO
THE RESEARCH!

“The One People’s Public Trust has created and filed legal documents based on The Law of One, Universal Law, and UCC law. It states, in effect, each Hue-man is a manifestation of the Creator Source, and as such is a Creator, and is NOT subordinate to any artificial principality or corporate fiction.

“The People’s Trust is truly the PEOPLE’s, as in Every Single People On This Planet’s Trust. There is no head, there is no spokesman, woman, person, alien, or fish. There is Everyone! We are One with the Creator. We are One with Each Other. Love One Another..”

Other documents which I have posted here are at the following posts: